In the table below all the ontologies used for testing in the different countries are listed together with a short description. Links to the actual ttl-file and the generated documentation for the ontology are also included in the table.
In addition some of the spin rule sets etc are listed. For these items no documentation is generated, but we have included a link to the actual ttl-files.
For more information about the test cases, please see the report "D.8 Report on the evaluation of the European Road OTL in the test cases".
|Country||Name and Description||File||Documentation||Comment|
|Germany:||asb-ing-condition: For storing the damage categories, based
on a German classification RI-ERH-ING
|asb-ing-klassification: ASB-Ing 2013 ontology for classification of bridge constructions||Technical
|SPIN Conversion.ASB-Ing-Demo_Bestandsmodell: SPIN linking rules based on the EIRs of the NRA in Hamburg from IFC (2x3) to ASB-Ing 2013||
|The Netherlands:||Maintenance: Testcase for register workflows of maintenance based on the RWS OTL classification and transport - Roadnetwork (inspire)||Technical Report|
|Survey: Testcase for register survey information for storing damage based on the RWS OTL classification||Technical Report|
|Norway:||Jaren with Curve Segment: Jaren test case with linked alignment||Technical
|Norwegian_NVDB: NVDB road network at Jaren with asset, including lighting||TechnicalReport|
|01_map_network.sparql: Convert the road network produced by the TNE software from Triona to Inspire network|
|NPRALighting: Lighting asset modeled based on Norwegian standardization work||Technical Report|
Lighting asset requirements for early design phase
||This OTL shows how to model specific handover data requirement/restrictions from one project phase to another.|